The issue was whether an RVO could grant conditional enrolment to an unqualified applicant. The authority held that such enrolment violates valuation rules. The key takeaway is that only fully eligible candidates can be admitted.
The issue was the absence of a mechanism to enforce lock-in on pledged shares. SEBI introduced a “non-transferable” tagging system through depositories.
The issue involved enhancing the existing NPS Swasthya scheme. The circular introduces PoC 2 with revised features to improve flexibility and evaluate the scheme under varied conditions.
The company failed to form mandatory board committees for over four years. The authority held that each non-compliance attracts separate penalties.
The case involved incorrect filing of director designation in statutory records. The authority held that prolonged failure to rectify the error constituted a continuing default, attracting maximum penalty.
The case involved failure to file mandatory Form MR-1 for appointment of a Whole-Time Director. The authority held that prolonged non-compliance constituted a continuing default and imposed maximum penalties under Section 450.
The company delayed appointment of independent directors despite crossing the threshold. The authority held that prolonged non-compliance attracts maximum penalty under the Companies Act.
The issue involved non-compliance with statutory requirements for maintaining board meeting minutes. The authority held that procedural lapses still attract penalties under Section 118.
The authority dropped penalty proceedings after finding that the company had already shifted its registered office and the error was unintentional. Timely compliance and lack of mala fide intent proved crucial.
The circular shifts SLAs from a renewal-based licensing system to a registration regime with annual fees. This ensures continuity of registration subject to compliance.
