Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : This guide explains when penalties can be imposed under various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also outlines the appli...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that reliance on third-party statements without granting effective cross-examination amounted to a violation of ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Corporate Law : Details on Indian government's blocking of YouTube channels, citing IT Rules 2021 and Section 69A of IT Act 2000. Learn about reas...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore remanded a Section 69A addition after holding that an APMC commission agent's entire sale proceeds could not be tre...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore deleted the Section 69A addition after holding that member details established the source of cash deposits made dur...
Income Tax : ITAT held that negative cash balances do not automatically establish undisclosed income and upheld addition only to the peak negat...
Income Tax : ITAT held that penalty under Section 271D cannot survive where the Assessing Officer failed to record satisfaction in the assessme...
Income Tax : ITAT Allahabad held that estimating gross profit solely on the basis of the subsequent years GP rate is not justified after reject...
Income Tax : CBDT has instructed tax officers to uniformly apply Sections 68 to 69D and Section 115BBE after a C&AG audit found inconsistencies...
ITAT Ahmedabad allows NRI’s appeal, quashing ₹8.31 lakh unexplained income addition for demonetization cash linked to pension & property sale.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside CIT(A) order, sending back case of Tosifbhai Tajdin Halani to AO for fresh assessment on unexplained cash, gifts, and expenditure.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses tax addition on loans for Arvindbhai R Nanavati after AO’s remand report verified identity, genuineness, & creditworthiness of creditors.
ITAT Pune sets aside NFAC order on ₹20.7 lakh cash deposit, remands case for fresh hearing citing non-speaking order and denial of opportunity.
ITAT Nagpur held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained money not tenable in absence of cross-examination and any corroborative evidence on record. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Rajkot held that the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act has been issued without obtaining the approval as prescribed under amended provision of section 151 of the Act is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Kolkata held that CIT(A) accepted additional evidence and allowed the relief u/s. 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act without allowing an opportunity of being heard to AO. Therefore, the order of CIT(A) is in contravention of Rule 46A(3) of the I.T. Rules, 1962.
Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal in Refrigerated Distributors case, ruling no substantial law question arose on profit estimate for bogus purchases.
Understand income tax rules for cash deposits in businesses using presumptive taxation (Sec 44AD, 44AE). Learn about unexplained credits and bank statements.
Tax tribunal remits Vijay Kumar Sharma assessment to CIT(A) for fresh hearing, citing non-compliance due to business hardship after demonetization.
