Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gangaiah Nagaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1954/Bang/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/12/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gangaiah Nagaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Conclusion: Addition against unexplained cash deposit of ₹49.50 lakh was remanded back to AO for verification if the deposits were from business activities, the addition under Section 69A could not stand.

Held: Assessee, was found to have made a cash deposit of Rs.49,45,800 and received contract income of Rs.3,03,315, with tax deducted at source. A notice under section 148 was issued on 29.3.2019 due to the assessee’s failure to file a return. After issuing a notice undersection 133(6) to Indian

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31