Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagdish Prasad Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 255/Lkw/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/12/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jagdish Prasad Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)

In the matter abovementioned ITAT deleted additions u/s 69A made on account of cash deposit during demonetization after considering the bank certificate which show actual amount of cash deposit.

Assessment was completed at Rs.8,79,916/- by making an addition of Rs. Rs.5,39,500/- u/s 69A on the ground that the aforesaid amount was deposited by the assessee during demonetization period.  First appeal was dismissed by Addl/JCIT(A).

Before ITAT it was submitted on behalf of assessee that assessee submitted that amount of Rs.39,500/- w

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31