Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : Explains the centralization of digital platforms, surveillance powers, and opaque governance. Key takeaway: citizens have limited ...
Income Tax : Detailed overview of penalties under various sections of the Income Tax Act, covering defaults in tax payment, reporting, document...
Income Tax : An overview of Sections 68-69D of India's Income-tax Act, which empower tax authorities to assess unaccounted income from unexplai...
Corporate Law : Details on Indian government's blocking of YouTube channels, citing IT Rules 2021 and Section 69A of IT Act 2000. Learn about reas...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that addition of Rs. 13 lakh under Section 69A through rectification proceedings exceeded the scope of Section...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice issued on 26.07.2022 was beyond the permissible timeline under the surviving limita...
Income Tax : Tribunal dismissed a Revenue appeal after finding that additions were made solely on basis of entries in a seized Excel file. It h...
In absence of details regarding rental receipt from property, explanation of assessee is that cash deposits into bank account is out of rental income, cannot be accepted
CBDT instructions dated 09/08/2019 speaks about the comparative analysis of cash deposits, cash sales, month wise cash sales and cash deposits. It also provides that whether in such cases the books of accounts have been rejected or not where substantial evidences of vide variation be found between these statistical analyses.
ITAT held that additions framed on account of undisclosed income being sustained in part is justified, where assessee was required to file complete details of such friends and relatives and also the details of sales but the same has not been done at any stage.
Held that cash withdrawn by the assessee from the bank was much more than the amount deposited due to demonetization. Further, there is no findings by the authorities that this cash available with the assessee was invested or utilised for any other purpose. Hence, addition u/s 69A unsustainable
Reasonable quantum of cash available out of past savings should be considered as being available to assessee to explain source of cash deposited in bank
Held that deeming provisions of section 115BBE doesn’t apply as source of income clearly explained and established by the assessee
ITAT held that cash gifts received by the assessee from her brother and sister cannot be added as unexplained income under section 69A.
Charu Aggarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Held that cash sales made by the assessee which was deposited in the bank post demonetization is sufficient source of cash deposited. Addition of the same unsustainable. Facts- A notice u/s 153A was issued to the assessee post search operation. Thereafter, the assessee filed its ROI declaring an income […]
If an assessee has cash available prior to demonetization and if he opted to deposit the same multiple times, there is no prohibition in law for such deposits.
Held that addition u/s. 68 and 69A unsustainable as evidences relating to cash deposited submitted and not doubted by AO and also books of account of the assessee are also not rejected u/s 145(3).
