Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : This guide explains when penalties can be imposed under various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also outlines the appli...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that reliance on third-party statements without granting effective cross-examination amounted to a violation of ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Corporate Law : Details on Indian government's blocking of YouTube channels, citing IT Rules 2021 and Section 69A of IT Act 2000. Learn about reas...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore remanded a Section 69A addition after holding that an APMC commission agent's entire sale proceeds could not be tre...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore deleted the Section 69A addition after holding that member details established the source of cash deposits made dur...
Income Tax : ITAT held that negative cash balances do not automatically establish undisclosed income and upheld addition only to the peak negat...
Income Tax : ITAT held that penalty under Section 271D cannot survive where the Assessing Officer failed to record satisfaction in the assessme...
Income Tax : ITAT Allahabad held that estimating gross profit solely on the basis of the subsequent years GP rate is not justified after reject...
Income Tax : CBDT has instructed tax officers to uniformly apply Sections 68 to 69D and Section 115BBE after a C&AG audit found inconsistencies...
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling in DCIT vs. Tapesh Tyagi case, clarifying that Section 115BBE doesn’t apply to surrendered income treated under Section 69A.
In a significant ruling, ITAT Delhi upholds deletion of cash addition in DCIT vs. Atul Gupta case for AY 2017-18 after demonetization. Get the full order details here
ITAT Delhi allows senior citizen’s appeal against Rs. 9 lakh addition under Section 69A. Assessing Officer failed to prove misuse of accumulated cash. Read the full order.
Addition under section 69A was not justified as AO had not brought on record any material in support of the addition made by him nor he provided any basis for arriving at the basis, particularly when all the 30 flats had not been sold during the year relevant to AY 2017-18, therefore, there was no basis for arriving at the conclusion that assessee had received any on-money.
Explore the impact of demonetization on cash deposits in India and the key legal insights from Section 69A vs. Section 44AD cases. Get valuable tax information.
ITAT Delhi held that commission taxed @2% of the amount of accommodation entries provided by the assessee has not been made on ad hoc basis, however, the same is as per prevailing market rate. Accordingly, the addition is sustained.
Vikram Udeshanghbhai Padhiyar vs. ITO case: ITAT Surat allows another chance for the Assessee due to non-compliance caused by email ID discrepancy.
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of Narendra Kumar Gupta, stating that books of account and vouchers are not required in a 44AD return, deleting additions u/s 69A.
ITAT Delhi rules addition u/s 69A for excess jewelry during a search operation unsustainable as the assessee belonged to a wealthy family and received jewelry on occasions
ITAT Raipur held that interest income earned is not equal to the percentage of interest expenditure incurred cannot be reason for disqualifying expenditure within the provision of section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act.
