Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : This guide explains when penalties can be imposed under various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also outlines the appli...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : A doctrinal analysis of unexplained cash credits, investments, and expenditure under Sections 68–69D. Explains burden of proof a...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT held that a registered sale deed without corroborative evidence is not incriminating material and cannot support additions in...
Income Tax : ITAT held that multiplying a seized figure without supporting evidence was unjustified and restricted the Section 69 addition to t...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that proceedings initiated under the old Section 153C framework after the Finance Act, 2021 amendments were leg...
Income Tax : Tribunal held that omission to mention the exact charging provision did not vitiate the assessment where unexplained cash and bull...
ITAT Delhi provides relief to Sanjay Store, ordering fresh assessment in ₹4.16 Cr demonetization case due to partner’s depression & father’s death. Penalties sent back.
A Comprehensive Analysis of Undisclosed Incomes under Sections 68 to 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, Taxation of these Incomes Under Section 115BBE and Penalty Provisions under Sections 271AAC & 271AAD With Insights on Explained vs. Unexplained Income, Judicial Precedents & Finance Act, 2025 Amendments 1. Introduction & Legal Context. The robust and equitable functioning […]
Non-compliance due to overseas employment leads to ITAT remanding Rs. 1.9 crore tax matter for fresh adjudication, offering assessee a new hearing opportunity.
NCLAT Delhi confirms NCLT’s jurisdiction under Companies Act S.213 and NCLT Rules 11 to refer corporate fraud cases to SFIO, even during IBC. Upholds probe into Bhuvana Infra Projects, Bank of Maharashtra, and directors based on forensic audit.
Understanding GST prosecution in India: Offenses, arrest powers, mens rea, tax liability, judicial precedents, and the process of sanctioning and compounding.
Chennai ITAT remands Rs. 2.31 crore addition for cash deposits and S. 40(a) disallowance, directing AO to conduct fresh enquiry.
Mumbai ITAT rules excess stock found during survey, when linked to business, is undeclared business income, not unexplained investment, thus avoiding Section 115BBE.
ITAT Allahabad held that renting out of property on day-to-day basis and providing certain facilities to those who would be taking premises on rent seems to be an organized activity of composite nature. Hence, income from the same is treated as business income.
Delhi High Court held that petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be entertained since there is extreme serious allegation of fraudulent availment of benefits under GST Act and petitioner has presented twisted facts.
As stated earlier, appellant had raised objection on 15.01.2022 against re-opening but the same was not disposed of by AO by passing a speaking order as per guidelines issued by SC in case of KGN Driveshafts.
