Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Chandrasekaran Joseph Vijay (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Chandrasekaran Joseph Vijay (ITAT Chennai)

ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69 towards unexplained investment merely based on loose sheets without any corroborative evidences is unsustainable in law. Also held that addition on the basis of mere assumption and presumption not sustainable.

Facts- During the course of search, certain incriminating material was found and seized. Consequently, notice u/s.153A was issued to the assessee on 07-12-2020. In response, the assessee admitted income of Rs.24.66 Crores. Notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) w

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31