Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kailashnath Arunkumar Dube Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kailashnath Arunkumar Dube Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) In the matter abovementioned ITAT partly allowed the appeal by estimation of 10% of total cash deposit towards possible revenue leakage. Assessee didnot file ITR for AY 2012-13 during which assessee made cash deposit of Rs.45,69,722/-. The case was reopened and notice u/s 148 was sent through e-mail against which no ITR was filed. Hence, AO made addition u/s 69A. Before CIT (A) it was argued that assessee was engaged in the activity of taking cash from various parties and used to issue cheques and taking 1.00% of commission on the transaction. The...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930