Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kailashnath Arunkumar Dube Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kailashnath Arunkumar Dube Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

In the matter abovementioned ITAT partly allowed the appeal by estimation of 10% of total cash deposit towards possible revenue leakage.

Assessee didnot file ITR for AY 2012-13 during which assessee made cash deposit of Rs.45,69,722/-. The case was reopened and notice u/s 148 was sent through e-mail against which no ITR was filed. Hence, AO made addition u/s 69A.

Before CIT (A) it was argued that assessee was engaged in the activity of taking cash from various parties and used to issue cheques and taking 1.00% of commissi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930