#Section 68
Log in to FollowLatest Section 68 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Section 68 cannot be applied where Assessee discharges onus to prove receipt of share capital along with premium

Addition u/s 68 cannot be made solely on the ground of non-production of payer’s bank statement

Addition u/s 68 not sustainable where whole transaction supported by adequate & reliable evidences

S. 68 – Mere Common address shared by several companies may not be sole ground to doubt identity or creditworthiness

Defunct companies at the time of assessment have resurrected back to life after statutory compliances were fulfilled, addition u/s 68 sustained

Addition u/s 68 on account of share application money not justified where validity of transaction beyond doubt

When revenue failed to show any legal infirmity in order of ITAT, no question of law arises in relation to Sec. 68

Addition cannot be made for mere failure of Assessee to furnish current address of depositors

Conclusions based on suspicion cannot take the place of proof : SC

Gift from abroad cannot be taxed on mere suspicion: HC

No addition for Gift from abroad if Donor gives statement before AO regarding his capacity despite non production of any document

Losses cannot be set-off against Bogus /unexplained cash credit Income

Penalty cannot be imposed for mere non acceptance of evidences during Quantum Assessment

No addition u/s 68 on account of money received on allotment of shares, once identity of Investor Company established
Explore the latest Section 68 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
