Income Tax : This guide explains when penalties can be imposed under various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also outlines the appli...
Income Tax : This guide explains how unexplained cash credits under Section 68 and related provisions can attract steep taxation under Section ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that profit cannot be estimated arbitrarily when regular books of account are maintained and not rejected unde...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata deleted the Section 68 addition, holding that share application money already assessed in subscribers' hands cannot b...
Income Tax : Calcutta HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal after the remand report confirmed the disputed receipt was sale proceeds of investments...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held Section 68 cannot apply to sale proceeds of disclosed investments already recorded in books. Revenue's appeals wer...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held Section 68 inapplicable where shares were disclosed in an earlier year and sale proceeds were already offered as i...
Income Tax : ITAT Agra held Section 44AD could not apply where turnover exceeded the limit, adopted past profit history, allowed telescoping an...
Income Tax : CBDT has instructed tax officers to uniformly apply Sections 68 to 69D and Section 115BBE after a C&AG audit found inconsistencies...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Calcutta High Court dismisses writ against ex parte service tax order, noting petitioner’s non-appearance and availability of an alternate remedy despite COVID-19 period.
ITAT Delhi confirms deletion of ₹3.07 Cr income tax addition for Tarun International Ltd., citing sufficient documentary evidence for share capital genuineness.
ITAT Mumbai overturns dismissal of appeals for Rajesh Babulal Shah, citing Supreme Court’s ‘Katiji’ ruling on condonation of delay and remanding cases.
ITAT Jaipur upholds CIT(A)’s order deleting ₹80 lakh addition under Section 68; holds share sale genuine and not accommodation entry.
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses revenue’s appeal, deleting additions for demonetisation-era cash deposits, citing a lack of evidence for tax evasion.
The ITAT Nagpur has set aside an ex-parte income tax addition of ₹7.38 lakh against a senior citizen agriculturist, citing lack of proper notice and unproven agricultural income.
ITAT Mumbai has ruled that Section 68 additions cannot be made if assessee does not maintain books of account. Court also allowed a deduction under Section 80C.
The ITAT Delhi has set aside the CIT(A)’s deletion of a ₹2.32 crore addition made under Section 68, citing a violation of Rule 46A as new evidence was admitted without giving the Assessing Officer a chance to examine it.
Calcutta High Court held that merely because share transactions were done through stock exchanges it doesn’t make the transactions genuine. Accordingly, bogus capital loss claim rejected and appeal of revenue allowed.
ITAT Delhi remanded the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer in the matter of addition of Rs. 30 Crores u/s. 68 since additional evidence filed under rule 29 of the ITAT Rules, 963 substantiating genuineness of business advances.
