Income Tax : This guide explains when penalties can be imposed under various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also outlines the appli...
Income Tax : This guide explains how unexplained cash credits under Section 68 and related provisions can attract steep taxation under Section ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that profit cannot be estimated arbitrarily when regular books of account are maintained and not rejected unde...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata deleted the Section 68 addition, holding that share application money already assessed in subscribers' hands cannot b...
Income Tax : Calcutta HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal after the remand report confirmed the disputed receipt was sale proceeds of investments...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held Section 68 cannot apply to sale proceeds of disclosed investments already recorded in books. Revenue's appeals wer...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held Section 68 inapplicable where shares were disclosed in an earlier year and sale proceeds were already offered as i...
Income Tax : ITAT Agra held Section 44AD could not apply where turnover exceeded the limit, adopted past profit history, allowed telescoping an...
Income Tax : CBDT has instructed tax officers to uniformly apply Sections 68 to 69D and Section 115BBE after a C&AG audit found inconsistencies...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)’s view that alleged accommodation loans were not supported by bank statements. Reopening and addition u/s 69A struck down; Revenue’s case dismissed.
The ITAT Delhi has restored an appeal by Mehinder Sharma, previously dismissed by the NFAC for non-compliance, granting a final opportunity to present his case.
ITAT Jaipur deletes additions on unsecured loans and partners’ capital for Vikas Oil Mill, citing sufficient evidence like ITRs and cash books to prove their genuineness.
ITAT Bangalore deletes a Section 68 addition on a trader’s demonetisation deposits, ruling that cash from business receipts cannot be taxed again after turnover is accepted.
It is settled proposition of law that CBDT circulars are binding on department and it has to be strictly followed by officers of department. AO cannot be permitted to travel beyond the issues for which case was selected for limited scrutiny without taking mandatory permission from concerned PCIT or Pr.CCIT.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses a revenue appeal, upholding the deletion of a ₹1.5 crore addition. The tribunal ruled the amount was a loan given, not a cash credit received.
Delhi High Court upholds ITAT’s decision, affirming that a taxpayer discharged the burden of proof for cash credits and that business center income is business income.
Gujarat High Court upholds deletion of ₹11.57 crore addition, ruling that repayment of loan within the same financial year proves its genuineness.
ITAT Delhi rules that cash deposits made during demonetization from recorded cash sales are not unexplained income, deleting an addition under Section 68.
The ITAT Delhi has upheld the deletion of a ₹3.51 crore addition, ruling that the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of unsecured loans.
