Service Tax : Despite doing away with the service-specific descriptions, there will be some descriptions where some differential treatment will ...
Income Tax : The Parliament has passed the the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2009 which is to replace the Competition (Amendment) Ordinance, 20...
Income Tax : The government is likely to seek the Cabinet’s approval on amending the Competition Act 2002 to facilitate the winding up of the...
Income Tax : After a lull, the contentious provisions regarding mergers and acquisitions (M&A’s) of the amended Competition Act is back on th...
Income Tax : Having regard to the gravity of the allegations, the ongoing investigation, the requirement of further probe into digital and fina...
Income Tax : The Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceedings became time-barred because no reassessment order was passed within the li...
Service Tax : Profit arising from purchase and sale of cargo space by a freight forwarder on principal-to-principal basis was trading income and...
Service Tax : CESTAT Chandigarh held that the Air Travel Agents are not required to pay Service Tax on the Commission received by them from CDS/...
Company Law : The tribunal held that mere suspicion or possibility of fraud without supporting evidence cannot justify action under Section 66 o...
Service Tax : Notification No. 43/2009-Service Tax Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that a practice was generally prevalent regarding...
Service Tax : Notification No. 33/2009 - Service Tax Central Government hereby exempts the taxable service provided to any person in relation to...
Income Tax : That the said Association will submit to the prescribed authority by 30th June, each year, a copy of their audited annual accounts...
NCLAT Delhi confirms NCLT’s jurisdiction under Companies Act S.213 and NCLT Rules 11 to refer corporate fraud cases to SFIO, even during IBC. Upholds probe into Bhuvana Infra Projects, Bank of Maharashtra, and directors based on forensic audit.
CESTAT Mumbai held that taxing entirety of income as consideration under ‘management, maintenance or repair service’ without disaggregating consideration among several activities is lack of wherewithal. Accordingly, order set aside and matter remanded back.
Patna High Court held that extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 in as much as transactions were not disclosed in ST-3 and relevant information were not provided to taxing authority.
Supreme Court held that resolution plan by Successful Resolution Application i.e. Piramal Capital and Housing Limited for Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd [DHFL] stands approved. Accordingly, appeal filed by assessee dismissed.
It also referred to similar findings in Matrix Partners India Investment Holdings, LLC vs DCIT and other precedents, reinforcing that exempt income did not form part of the computation of total income under Indian law.
NCLT Mumbai approved resolution plan of Corporate Debtor [Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd] as submitted by resolution applicant [M/s. Raigaon Sugar & Power Ltd.] as resolution plan meets requirements of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
NCLT Chandigarh held that since resolution plan in respect of Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Private Limited meets requirement of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the same stands approved as filed by the resolution professional.
The Respondent had preferred applicaton under Section 66 of the Code wherein Respondent Nos. 1-2 are the suspended directors and the Nos. 3-5 are promoters qua the CD and the Applicants herein are arrayed as Respondents No. 6-9.
Karnataka High Court held that total consideration under composition scheme doesn’t include amount received from customer towards land. Thus, consideration for works contract under composition Scheme of KVAT doesn’t include receipt for land cost.
TDS is always deducted from the amount payable and it is not any other consideration. Therefore, the demand on this score cannot sustain and hence, the impugned order to this extent is set aside.
