Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samy Construction Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Samy Construction Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that sub-contractor is liable to pay service tax. Accordingly, demand of service tax on sub-contractors for normal period is sustained. Facts- The appellant is engaged in providing various services mainly to Government of India Undertakings, Municipality, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Corporates. It is the case of the department that the appellant did not pay proper service tax on various contracts and accordingly, service tax has been demanded with interest and penalty. Conclusion- Held that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930