Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samy Construction Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Samy Construction Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that sub-contractor is liable to pay service tax. Accordingly, demand of service tax on sub-contractors for normal period is sustained. Facts- The appellant is engaged in providing various services mainly to Government of India Undertakings, Municipality, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Corporates. It is the case of the department that the appellant did not pay proper service tax on various contracts and accordingly, service tax has been demanded with interest and penalty. Conclusion- Held that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930