Income Tax : The new law treats gains from depreciable assets as short-term capital gains for all purposes, not merely for computation. This ef...
Income Tax : Courts held that investment in under-construction property qualifies as construction under Sections 54/54F. Deduction cannot be de...
Income Tax : Courts held that exemption cannot be denied merely due to lack of registration if possession and substantial payment are proven. T...
Income Tax : The Finance Act 2023 introduced a 12.5% LTCG tax without indexation as an alternative to 20% with indexation. Taxpayers must compa...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that Section 54 focuses on timely investment of capital gains, not rigid legal ownership milestones. The ...
Income Tax : Representation against Extension of time limit under section 54 to 54GB without extension of Income Tax Return due date Vidarbha I...
CA, CS, CMA, Income Tax : We have not noticed any heed being extended towards various issues and possible solutions we have proposed through those represent...
Income Tax : KSCAA has requested to Hon’ble Minister of Finance to extend various time limits under section 54 to 54GB of the Income-tax Act,...
Income Tax : All India Federation of Tax Practitioners (CZ) has requested CBDT that due date of filing return of income u/s 139(1) for all the ...
Income Tax : Direct Taxes Committee of ICAI has Request(s) for extension of various due dates under Income-tax Act, 1961 especially Tax Audit R...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that additional documents already referred to in a criminal complaint can be filed later under Section 3...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that for under-construction properties, the date of possession is the relevant factor for Section 54 exemption. ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that selling only open land, even if earlier part of a residential property, does not qualify as transfer of a r...
Income Tax : The issue was denial of capital gains exemption due to claim under wrong section. The tribunal held that a genuine claim cannot be...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai set aside the appellate order and remanded issues on protective addition, Section 54F exemption, and TDS credit misma...
CA, CS, CMA : The ICAI Disciplinary Committee reprimanded CA Jayant Ishwardas Mehta for professional misconduct involving an incorrect income t...
Income Tax : For claiming exemption Section 54 to 54 GB of the Act, for which last date falls between 01st April. 2021 to 28th February, 2022 m...
Income Tax : Vide Income Tax Notification No. 35/2020 dated 24.06.2020 govt extends Due date for ITR for FY 2018-19 upto 31.07.2020, Last...
Income Tax : Notification No. 44/2012-Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 54, sub-section (2) of secti...
ITAT Chandigarh held that deduction u/s 54B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not admissible if the new capital asset i.e. agriculture land is purchased in the name of wife of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal of assessee partly allowed.
Summary of ITAT Mumbai decision in Tejal Kaushal Shah vs ITO case. Examines Section 54 deduction for joint property and Section 23 deemed rental income dispute.
Uttarakhand High Court held that order is invalid since the same is passed invoking the provisions of rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 [CGST Rules] after the same was omitted on 8th October 2004.
ITAT Mumbai held that date of allotment letter, rather than date on which purchase deed of conveyance was entered, should be considered for holding period of the property. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
NCLAT Chennai held that post completion of liquidation process and property of Corporate Debtor is handed over to Successful Auction Purchaser, order u/s. 33(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, directing liquidation of corporate debtor’s cannot be revoked.
Mumbai ITAT clarifies LTCG on property: Allotment date, not registration, determines holding period. Impact on tax, Sec 54/54F claims.
NCLT Mumbai held that the private sale has to be conducted by the liquidator in a manner so as to maximize the realizations from the sale of assets. Since strategy to maximize realisation from sale of assets absent.
Delhi High Court held that once addition on the basis of which reasons recorded for reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act has been deleted, then, other addition made are not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Indore deleted Rs. 70.13 lakh investment addition, ruling source of funds sufficiently explained, overturning part of CIT(A) order.
The petitioner raised bills on respondent No.4 based on the works executed from time to time, TDS @ 2% on the total value of the bills were recovered by respondent No.4 for the value of works executed in the State of Telangana and Maharashtra.
