Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Vilpaben Pranavbhai Vora (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Vilpaben Pranavbhai Vora (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai: Section 68 Addition Deleted – Mere Suspicion & Third-Party Info Not Enough In this case, the ITAT Mumbai upheld deletion of ₹5 crore addition u/s 68, holding that general allegations based on third-party search findings cannot substitute concrete evidence against the assessee. The Tribunal observed that: The AO relied heavily on investigation wing reports and search findings in other cases, without bringing any specific incriminating material against the assessee, The assessee had furnished complete documentary evidence-confi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031