#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

No penalty for duly disclosed transactions reflected in seized dairies in Returns pursuant to Section 153A notice

No Penalty if issue is debatable on which Appeal is been admitted

Despite addition no penalty when Assessee has already disclosed all facts

Penalty cannot be imposed for merely treating capital asset as Agricultural Land

ITAT remands back the issue of Section 271(1)(c) Penalty to AO

No penalty if no deliberate attempt to evade payment of taxes

No section 36(1)(iii) disallowance unless Direct Nexus between Borrowed Funds & Capital Withdrawals

Section 132(4) statement & notings found during search sufficient to invoke section 153A jurisdiction

Football & Income Tax- Penalty, in both, is Hefty

Once quantum addition deleted, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) has no legs to stand

Mere Rejection of section 35D claim not amounts to Concealment of Income

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty proceedings not sustainable if not specifies Limb

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Justified if Assessee not Acted Bonafidely

ITAT Allowed Exemption not claimed in ITR filed due to Inadvertence
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
