#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

ITAT stays demand raised on addition made by CIT(A)

Penalty cannot be imposed for Mere ALP computation method change by TPO

Smallness of amount of additions vis-a-vis returned loss is a bonafide explanation

Penalty order liable for cancellation if penalty notice do not specify why it is been initiated

Penalty Notice without Application of Mind by AO is Invalid

No Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) if Not specifically mentioned in assessment order as to which limb penalty was imposed

Invocation of Explanation 7 to Section 271(1)(c) in blanket manner is contrary to purpose for which it was engrafted in statute

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed for non deduction of TDS

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) not sustainable on failure of AO to strike off inappropriate words in show-cause notice U/s. 274

Concealment of income & furnishing of inaccurate particulars are distinct and separate charge

No penalty for addition to Income based on mere credit card A/c entries

Penalty cannot be imposed for mere disclosure of income due to search operation, instead of original return

Penalty cannot be imposed U/s. 271(1)(c) in absence of recording of satisfaction by AO

Penalty cannot be imposed for Bonafide omission during return filing, surfaced during Section 148/148 Assessment
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
