#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

When order in quantum has been decided in favour of assessee penalty cannot be levied u/s 271(1)(c)

Penalty cannot be imposed on preponderance of probabilities

Inadvertent Claims in ITR – Whether a Hard Nut To Crack

Income determined on estimate basis, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed

Penalty cannot be imposed if explanation given by the assessee cannot be brushed aside as totally false

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) can’t be levied in succeeding year if on similar/ identical disallowance, no penalty was levied in preceding year

Mere acceptance by assessee of addition not entitles department to levy concealment penalty

Disclosure of Income after Search at sister concerns office cannot be called voluntary

No Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) on Bonafide claim of wrong deduction

Non-furnishing of any explanation itself will lead to Penal Consequences

Important Case Laws on Income Tax Penalty Provisions

Penalty imposed not sustainable if Quantum Assessment itself quashed

Penalty not justified on voluntary surrender of unexplained income

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed for failure to deduct TDS
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
