Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that revisional powers under Section 263 cannot be exercised when the Assessing Officer has already examined the iss...
Income Tax : ITAT quashed PCIT’s Section 263 order, holding AO’s treatment of survey income as business income valid and not erroneous or p...
Income Tax : Ahmedabad ITAT quashes reassessments based on ACB report, ruling the AO lacked independent "reason to believe" and only used borro...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune upholds PCIT's order u/s 263, setting aside an assessment for failure to verify ₹82.64 crore in advances for property...
Income Tax : National Chamber of Industries & Commerce, U.P has made a representation against Indiscriminate notices by the Income Tax Depa...
Income Tax : KSCAA has made a Representation on Challenges in Income Tax Related to Rectification Proceedings, Order Giving Effect, Delay in P...
Income Tax : One of the key sources of dispute is the existing arrangement for follow up on audit objections by Internal Audit Party and the Re...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that amortization of BOT road project expenditure must be computed based on the actual concession period and not ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment order could not be revised under Section 263 since the conditions for treating jewellery e...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that assessment orders passed pursuant to earlier remand directions were barred by limitation under Section 15...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions beyond the specific issues remanded by the Principal Commissioner ...
Karnataka High Court allows PCIT’s appeal, upholding a Section 263 revision for non-disallowance of commission payments without TDS, citing AO’s lack of explicit inquiry.
Karnataka High Court upholds Section 263 revision for erroneous 100% depreciation allowance on leasehold improvements, citing AO’s lack of inquiry and application of mind.
The Kerala High Court ruled that an income tax assessment based on a DVO’s valuation cannot be revised under Section 263 without concrete material proving error.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition based on statement is liable to be quashed as the statement was recorded from the back of the assessee and the assessee was not given an opportunity to cross-examine the deponent. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that provisions of section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act gets applicable as source of undisclosed income admitted during the course of survey not explained. Merely disclosing and paying tax doesn’t protect assessee from clutches of section 69A.
Gujarat High Court held that interest from co-operative bank is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act as Cooperative bank is a Cooperative society registered under the Gujarat State Cooperative Societies Act. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Pune Zilha Madhyawarti Sahakari Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed as AO conducted detailed enquiry and after proper application of mind has taken one of the view legally permissible and concluded the assessment. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The […]
Gujarat High Court held that no writ petition is maintainable against the show cause notice under section 263(1) of the Income Tax Act when notice is self-speaking and self-explanatory. Accordingly, writ dismissed as alternate remedy to prefer an appeal before Tribunal available.
ITAT Delhi overturns PCIT’s revision order against Umesh Garg, ruling the original assessment wasn’t erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, citing sufficient inquiry.
ITAT Mumbai rules on taxation of unsold real estate inventory for Sabarmati Capital One Ltd., clarifying Section 22 applicability and AO’s jurisdiction under Section 263.
