Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held reassessment orders invalid because the assessee was not supplied with the recorded reasons for reopening under Se...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that amortization of BOT road project expenditure must be computed based on the actual concession period and not ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that the reassessment notice issued on 24.07.2022 was time-barred under the Supreme Court ruling in Rajeev Bansal...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment based solely on search material seized from a third party must be initiated under Section 15...
The ITAT Mumbai deleted a ₹2.30 crore penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposed on World Series Hockey Pvt Ltd, ruling that a disallowance of a bad debts claim made in good faith does not attract penalty.
ITAT, Pune, ruled in Manisha Dhananjay Holkar vs. ITO that CIT (Appeals) [CIT(A)] cannot dismiss an appeal solely due to appellant’s non-appearance.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), allowed the appeal of P. Maneklal & Co., deleting the addition of Rs. 4,78,500 under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made for unexplained gold stock found during a survey.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Income Tax Dept’s appeal, ruling that only the 0.7% margin earned on E-top-up sales routed to Vodafone is taxable income under Section 69A.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside GST assessment denial, remanding case for fresh hearing. Court holds non-compliance was due to severe family illness, violating natural justice.
Pune ITAT rules CIT(A) wrongly applied new S. 251(1) proviso to remand a scrutiny assessment, which only applies to S. 144 orders. CIT(A) directed to decide the appeal on merits.
ITAT Nagpur held that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act admissible in case of interest earned from fixed deposit with bank. Accordingly, deduction claimed by the assessee is allowed by deleting the addition.
The ITAT Delhi sets aside over ₹1112 Cr in tax additions in Enormous Nivesh Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, ruling that Section 56(2)(viia) applies only to the ‘transfer’ of shares, not the ‘fresh allotment’ (issue) of shares, which is governed by Section 56(2)(viib).
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that reopening an assessment u/s 147 is invalid if based on general, unverified portal information lacking a “live link” to the assessee’s escaped income. Case dismissed.
ITAT Lucknow held that claim has been allowed by AO in scrutiny proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Act, it was natural that the demand raised on the same issue under section 143(1)(a) of the Act is required to be modified. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
