Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shamsundar Kaliram Agarwal (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Shamsundar Kaliram Agarwal (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune: CIT(A) Cannot Remand 143(3)/144B Assessment – Must Decide on Merits- New 251(1) Proviso Not Applicable – Tribunal Quashes NFAC’s Remand to AO Pune Tribunal considered whether CIT(A) was justified in remanding an assessment back to AO by invoking the new proviso to section 251(1) inserted by Finance Act 2024. Assessee’s assessment was originally completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144B on 20.04.2021 at ₹50.80 crore against returned income of ₹2.93 lakh. CIT(A) by order dated 29.05.2023 had directed AO to recompute income based on peak ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031