#Section 148
Log in to FollowLatest Section 148 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Despite Offering Income In S. 148 ROI, S. 271(1)(c) Penalty Leviable

s.148 notice beyond 4 years without compliance of s.147 & s.151(2) not valid

S.148 notice after 4 years not valid if Assessee disclosed full & true particular of claim at the time of original assessment proceeding

Extension of time for completion of assessments and reassessments

Reassessment notice not invalid just because of absence of suffix private Limited in Notice

Reopening Notice u/s 147 issued within Limitation Period but served after Limitation Period is valid

For exercise of power U/s. 263, it is mandatory that order passed by AO should be erroneous and prejudicial to interest of Revenue

Delay in notice U/s. 143(2) Renders Assessment Void – HC

Retrospective amendment no basis to reopen beyond 4 years – HC Disapproves AO’s Practice to Delay Passing Objection Orders

Sanction of CIT instead of JCIT renders reopening u/s. 147 of Income Tax Act invalid

Notice U/s. 148 is invalid In absence of any live link with the reasons recorded and the belief formed

AO cannot assess other ‘escaped income’ if reason for issue of Notice under section 148 dropped

Despite specific queries in scrutiny assessment, AO cannot be said to have formed any opinion if explicit opinion not recorded

Reassessment not permissible if reasons recorded are merely change of opinion
Explore the latest Section 148 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
