Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : ITAT held that a return filed under section 148 remains valid even if delayed. Failure to issue mandatory notice under section 143...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill 2026 proposes allowing taxpayers to file an Updated Return even after receiving a reassessment notice under Secti...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : Court ruled that reassessment notices under Section 148 must be issued through the faceless mechanism under Section 151A and the 2...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Jharkhand High Court held that retrospective insertion of Section 147A removed the jurisdictional challenge against reassessme...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
ITAT Chennai analyzes the applicability of Section 115BBE to seized cash and gold coins in the case of Uthangarai Sri Vidya Mandir Educational Trust. The trust argued that Section 115BBE applies only if no explanation is provided for the income.
Maddikunta Sanjeeva Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad): Analysis of ITAT’s decision to delete additions made by AO due to incomplete notice under section 148.
ITAT Kolkata deletes Rs. 40 Lakh addition against City Shoppe Estates, affirming identity, creditworthiness of share subscribers, and transaction genuineness.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules no addition based on third-party documents in Smt. Lilaben Rameshbhai Savaliya Vs. DCIT. Detailed analysis of the case and implications.
ITAT Jaipur directs AO to quash Assessment Order under section 143(3) of Income Tax Act as notice to deceased assessee is deemed invalid. Detailed analysis and case precedents provided.
The Kerala High Court rules that additional income disclosed voluntarily cannot be treated as concealed income under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
Read the detailed analysis of Delhi HC judgment quashing Income Tax Notices issued under Section 148A(b) and 148. Learn why the court ruled against the Revenue.
Learn why a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 beyond the four-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year is deemed invalid, with insights from a recent ITAT decision.
Discover the ITAT Delhi ruling in Anurag Singh vs. ITO, where it was decided that AO cannot rectify issues already settled by CIT(A). Full case analysis and implications.
ITAT concluded that the service of notice under Section 148 was improper and did not meet statutory requirements. Consequently, the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid, and the assessment order was quashed as void ab initio.
