Case Law Details
PCIT Vs Ambady Krishna Menon (Kerala High Court)
The case of PCIT Vs Ambady Krishna Menon, adjudicated by the Kerala High Court, revolves around the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on the respondent/assessee, Ambady Krishna Menon. The case delves into the intricacies of whether the respondent/assessee’s actions amounted to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, thereby warranting the imposition of penalty.
The respondent/assessee filed a return for the assessment year 2011-12, declaring a total income and capital gain. Subsequently, the Revenue suspected suppression of the capital gain declared by the assessee. Upon investigation, it was revealed that there was an inadvertent error in the computation of capital gains in the original return. The assessee voluntarily disclosed this error and expressed readiness to pay the differential tax. The Revenue issued a notice under Section 148 for reassessment, and the assessee filed a fresh return, paying the differential tax along with interest.
The assessment was completed with no addition to the disclosed income. However, the Revenue imposed a penalty under Section 271(1)(c), alleging concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The First Appellate Authority canceled the penalty, finding no evidence of concealment. The Revenue appealed, but the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal on technical grounds, stating that the penalty notice was defective.
The Kerala High Court deliberated on whether the conditions for invoking Section 271(1)(c) were fulfilled. The provision mandates penalties when there is concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The court emphasized that the satisfaction of the Assessing Authority regarding these conditions must occur during proceedings initiated under the Income Tax Act.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
