Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Surat held that revisionary order passed by PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee to file relevant material evidences and documents before him is liable to be remanded back for fresh consideration of the matter.
ITAT Kolkata held that penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act not leviable as turnover of the assessee is less than INR 1 Crore. Accordingly, the assessee is outside the purview of section 44AB of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Amritsar held that high seas sale transaction cannot be treated as speculative transaction as entire transaction is going through by proper delivery of the goods during purchase and the documents are provided for evidence of delivery of goods.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) is allowable on the entire interest income received by the assessee from the Co-operative bank which includes the amount credited to the balance sheet.
Detailed look into Delhi High Court’s ruling in Om Parkash Vs ITO case regarding taxation on agricultural land sale without adjusting cost of acquisition
ITAT Indore judgement in Mohan Yadav Vs ITO case, focusing on necessity of issuing notice under section 143(2) of Income Tax Act within a prescribed time limit.
ITAT Mumbai held that when appellant objects to the adoption of stamp duty value in terms of section 50C(1) of the Income Tax Act as full value of consideration, AO is under obligation to refer the matter to the valuation officer under section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Kolkata remanded the matter back to AO for the purpose of verification of documents and materials placed on record in respect of anonymous donations as well as the explanation for receipt of hall rent and accommodation so as to allow the claim of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act.
ITAT Indore held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 stood abated by virtue of search and seizure action u/s 132(1). Hence, reassessment order passed thereon u/s 147 is illegal.
ITAT Mumbai held that reassessment proceedings u/s 148 within limitation period specified under section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act is valid and sustainable in law.
