Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and remanded the matter after directing the AO to consider t...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Bombay High Court ruling: Assessing Officer (AO) must record dissatisfaction with Assessee’s claim regarding expenditure. Detailed analysis of PCIT-2 Vs Tata Capital Ltd case.
Delhi High Court rules AO can’t deviate from Transfer Pricing Officer’s determined Arm’s Length Price (ALP) in international transactions, upholding assessee’s writ petition.
Madras High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on a grossly erroneous factual foundation and also based on mechanically granted approval is untenable in law.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruling regarding Section 54 deduction to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for property purchase in an individual’s name. The decision emphasizes the principle against allowing a change of opinion in reassessment proceedings, based on established legal precedents.
In the case of Vijay Rajnikant Patel Vs PCIT, ITAT Ahmedabad rules that Section 263 revisionary powers are limited to issues addressed in limited scrutiny, ensuring adherence to CBDT instructions.
Analysis of Bharat Jaroli vs PCIT case by ITAT Indore, highlighting AO’s failure to scrutinize cash payments under Sec 40A. Detailed review and outcome provided.
In the case of Ketan Prabhulal Dalsaniya Vs DCIT, ITAT Indore rules that once the business income of the wife is accepted during scrutiny, the AO cannot tax the husband again, stating the wife wasn’t the one carrying the business.
Bangalore ITAT remits the case back to the AO for fresh consideration, citing enhancement made to taxpayer’s income without following procedures under Sec 154.
Naresh Chandra Kalwani Vs PCIT case discusses excess stock, business assessment, and the applicability of section 69/69A/115BBE under Income-tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that benefit of deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act available even in case of addition of unsubstantiated share capital into the account of the assessee under Section 68 of the Act.
