Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Apeejay Surrendra Management Services Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata held that deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act can be added in the hands of beneficial shareholder who is having controlling interest (substantial interest). Facts- Assessee is engaged in the business of Brand Owning and Consultancy. During the year […]
Read the detailed analysis of Fortune Park Hotels Ltd vs. ACIT case where ITAT Delhi allowed deduction of ESOP expenses claimed within the prescribed time limit.
ITAT Delhi held that there is no provision regarding establishment of virtual service PE under India-Singapore DTAA and hence physical rendition of service in India is required under India-Singapore DTAA as per present service PE.
Learn about the ITAT Mumbai ruling that prohibits filing appeals during a moratorium under section 14 IBC, as seen in the case of Kaushal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO.
HCG Global Communications Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) case ruling: Telecom interconnect usage payments received by a foreign company from an Indian operator deemed non-taxable as ‘royalty’ under the Income Tax Act.
In the case of Dhanterash Sales Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, ITAT Kolkata ruled that the assessment order was deemed time-barred due to lack of evidence for timely issuance, dismissing the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
ITAT Mumbai held that rate of interest @18% paid to related party towards unsecured loan is reasonable as rate of interest charged by bank @12% is with security, whereas, rate of interest charged on unsecured loan is without any security.
Explore the detailed analysis of the ITAT Delhi order in the case of Himenviro Environmental Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, focusing on product development expenses, liquidated damages, and more.
Mumbai ITAT allows depreciation on ‘right to collect toll tax’ on infrastructure facilities for Roadstar Investment vs ACIT. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act merely based on the investigation report without concluding the nature of alleged accommodation entry is unjustifiable and liable to be quashed.
