Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and remanded the matter after directing the AO to consider t...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
The assessee is carrying on business activity of export of software development and distinct services as Proprietor of Versatiletech. The return was picked up for scrutiny for the reason of compliance with TDS provisions and also foreign outward remittances.
Tribunal also took note of the fact that AO had merely reproduced identical reasons for multiple years without verifying facts or forming a belief based on individual year-specific material.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards capital contribution deleted since assessee furnished adequate evidence to prove the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the partner. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable since revenue/ department failed to establish that LTCG earned is non-genuine. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on incorrect facts and incorrect recording of reasons is invalid and bad-in-law. Accordingly, reopening is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that approval memo u/s. 153D of the Income Tax Act is totally silent on the issues involved and has been granted omnibus approval without any thoughtful process being discernible. Thus, assessment order vitiated due to such mechanical approval.
Gujarat High Court held that initiation of revisionary proceeding under section 263 of the Income Tax Act post complete extinguishment of all tax liabilities of Corporate Debtor upon approval of resolution plan is not tenable in law. Thus, notice u/s. 263 quashed.
ITAT Mumbai allows appeal of Jasmine Bhaskar Shah against PCIT’s Section 263 revision on exemption under 54F and indexation of gifted shares.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that donation to, Shri Arvindo Institute of applied scientific research, which is not recognised research institute is not eligible for deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, deduction disallowed and appeal dismissed.
It also referred to similar findings in Matrix Partners India Investment Holdings, LLC vs DCIT and other precedents, reinforcing that exempt income did not form part of the computation of total income under Indian law.
