Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Ahmedabad narrows PCIT’s directions under Section 263 in Vimal Agarwal’s tax case for AY 2014-15, limiting inquiry to commission on ₹92 lakh entry.
Summary of an appeal against a CIT(A) order confirming additions under Section 69A for AY 2017-18. Directions issued for de-novo proceedings.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Bholaram Education Society’s tax appeal for fresh hearing after procedural lapses in notices and portal access issues.
The ITAT Delhi has remitted Pragya Thareja’s case for fresh adjudication by CIT(A) due to lack of detailed reasoning in the earlier order for AY 2014-15.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that provisions of Sick Industrial Companies Act [SICA] would override the provisions of Income Tax Act. Thus, set off of business loss granted on the basis of Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction [BIFR] order.
Bombay High Court held that assessment order passed after expiry of period of limitation as prescribed under section 153 of the Income Tax Act read with first proviso below explanation 1 is barred by limitation. Accordingly, petition succeeds.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards cash deposit in bank account u/s. 69A as unexplained liable to be deleted since assessee satisfactorily explained the source. Accordingly, addition deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition of short term capital gain on account of transfer of shares on presumption basis without bringing on record evidencing actual receipt of consideration cannot be sustained. Accordingly, addition deleted.
Assessee is a co-operative Bank. Assessment was completed u/s 143(3) at Rs. 7, 86, 05,056/- after allowing a claim of Rs.23,27,543/- towards contribution towards PACS development fund as business expenditure.
ITAT Kolkata deletes Rs.52.25 lakh addition under Section 69A for unaccounted fees. Evidence proved the amount was properly accounted for in the trust’s records.
