Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by the denial of the benefit of paying tax at lower rate in terms of Section 115BAA of the Act, which was introduced by the virtue of Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019 with effect from 01.04.2020.
ITAT Delhi dismisses revenue appeal, upholding the quashing of reassessment proceedings against Vishal Gold & Precious Stones due to ‘borrowed satisfaction’ and lack of a ‘live link’ to the assessment year.
Delhi High Court orders expeditious disposal of Casio India’s 12-year-pending income tax appeal, noting ₹3.5 crore recovery by tax authorities despite unresolved disputes.
Chandigarh ITAT condones significant appeal delays, allows Punjab Agricultural University’s tax exemption claim under 10(23C)(iiiab) despite counsel’s filing errors.
ITAT Delhi held that denial of exemption u/s. 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act not justified as loans are borrowed at higher rate solely for the benefit of the society and under the circumstances which are beyond the control of the assessee-society.
Department replied on 29 November 2018, and assessee kept following up for the refund with interest. But no further response came. Revenue rejected the refund, saying the 2018 reply was not a valid order under the Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that issue of applicability of section 115JB to National Dairy Development Board is debatable and not a mistake apparent from record hence rectification order passed is beyond the scope of section 154 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that goodwill arose from the excess of consideration over the net value of tangible assets transferred in amalgamation and was therefore a valid intangible asset eligible for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii).
AO held that assessee had made repayment of the loan to M/s. Tata Finance Corporation in that financial year to the extent of Rs. 6,71,939 in cash against the loan taken for commercial vehicle.
The Gujarat High Court invalidated a tax reopening notice against Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah, ruling it was based on a “change of opinion” rather than new material, after the original assessment was already scrutinized.
