Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Delhi held that taxability of service receipt amounts in terms of India- Thailand DTAA needs fresh consideration since relevant documents are not submitted. Accordingly, appellant is directed to submit all the details before DRP.
Mumbai ITAT rules ACG Pam Pharma’s CSR donations are eligible for Section 80G deduction, quashing PCIT’s revisional order and restoring the AO’s assessment.
ITAT Chennai held that salary income for services rendered in China is not taxable in India. Accordingly, benefit of exemption under Article 15(1) of the DTAA between India-China. Thus, order set aside and appeal allowed.
ITAT Delhi held that doubting the whole transaction of sale of shares as sham transaction merely on the basis of discrepancy in the record maintained by ROC not justifiable. Accordingly, appeal allowed stating that suspicion howsoever strong cannot taken place of evidence.
ITAT Mumbai held that no addition can be made on the ground that notices issued u/s 133(6) of the Act were not replied. Accordingly, deletion of addition by CIT(A) is justified and appeal of department quashed to that extent.
ITAT Pune remands case regarding set-off of brought-forward business losses against deemed short-term capital gains from depreciable assets, citing judicial precedents and scope of Section 143(1).
Delhi High Court sets aside tax action against Rajat Sharma’s Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. over alleged unaccounted foreign remittances for AY 2017-18.
ITAT Delhi held that interest income from fixed deposits and loans given to employees is eligible for claiming benefit under section 10AA of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, AO allowed to claim deduction u/s. 10AA and appeal of assessee allowed.
Karnataka High Court held that notices or communication issued by department sent to old email address of the petitioner instead of updated email address not justifiable. Accordingly, order not sustained in view of no proper notice and no proper opportunity of fair hearing.
ITAT Delhi rules PCIT’s Section 263 invocation on interest disallowance invalid when loan addition is pending before CIT(A), citing judicial precedent.
