Income Tax : Understand the taxability, registration, and exemption provisions for charitable and religious trusts under Sections 11–13, incl...
Income Tax : Understand the taxation of trusts in India, covering registered and unregistered trusts. Learn about relevant sections, exemptions...
Income Tax : Shalki Bansal Charitable/religious trusts are the trusts which are formed with an objective of providing relief to poor, education...
Finance : Despite the clear objective behind enacting SARFAESI Act, 2002, while implementing the provisions of the Act, many complications h...
Fema / RBI : The enactment of ‘Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002’ has fa...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held that grants disbursed by a statutory corporation formed part of its core business functions and qualified a...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that before the amendment effective from 01.04.2015, exemption under Section 54 could be claimed for investment in...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal admitted the voluntary insolvency application after examining financial statements, bank records, and other documents...
Income Tax : The tribunal ruled that section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the Commissioner believes further enquiry was possible. Unles...
Corporate Law : The High Court ruled that wilful default and pending recovery proceedings do not, by themselves, justify Look Out Circulars. Witho...
NCLAT Delhi held that appellant as a personal guarantor, has been deliberately avoiding participation in the Section 95 proceedings. Accordingly, initiation of proceeding u/s. 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against personal guarantor duly admitted by NCLT.
Delhi High Court held that bail in serious money laundering case involving defalcation of public money not granted as ED’s case is founded not on mere suspicion but on extensive documentary evidence, forensic audits, and statements recorded u/s. 50 of the PMLA.
In RCM there was no output tax liability because it was treated as exempt and, therefore, in tune with the objective of GST, credit of ITC could not be claimed in the absence of liability but same could be claimed by the recipient of service.
The Interim Resolution Professional should perform all his functions as contemplated, inter-alia, by Sections 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21 of the Code and transact proceedings with utmost dedication, honesty and strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Code, Rules and Regulations.
Calcutta High Court held that DRAT order dismissing appeal of MSME upheld since MSME did not avail of the facilities and allowed the Securitization and Reconstruction of financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 to run its course, then it is not entitled to any protection.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is duly admissible since default occurred subsequent to section 10A period. Accordingly, order upheld and appeal dismissed.
Supreme Court held that Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises does require MSME to notify the lending bank by producing authenticated and verifiable documents/material to show its eligibility to get the benefit of the said Framework.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] filed by Financial Creditor [SBI] u/s. 7 of IBC against Corporate Debtor [Raninga Paper Mills Private Limited] is admitted as existence of financial debt and default demonstrated.
Delhi High Court held that liability of deceased guarantor to repay debt shall fall upon legal representative. Hence, petitioner being legal representative of deceased guarantor is liable to make pre-deposits as envisaged in section 21 of the Recovery and Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 [RDB Act].
The J&K High Court has ruled that a fresh notice to a borrower’s legal heirs is not required for a bank to take possession of an asset under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
