Income Tax : Understand the taxability, registration, and exemption provisions for charitable and religious trusts under Sections 11–13, incl...
Income Tax : Understand the taxation of trusts in India, covering registered and unregistered trusts. Learn about relevant sections, exemptions...
Income Tax : Shalki Bansal Charitable/religious trusts are the trusts which are formed with an objective of providing relief to poor, education...
Finance : Despite the clear objective behind enacting SARFAESI Act, 2002, while implementing the provisions of the Act, many complications h...
Fema / RBI : The enactment of ‘Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002’ has fa...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held that grants disbursed by a statutory corporation formed part of its core business functions and qualified a...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that before the amendment effective from 01.04.2015, exemption under Section 54 could be claimed for investment in...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal admitted the voluntary insolvency application after examining financial statements, bank records, and other documents...
Income Tax : The tribunal ruled that section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the Commissioner believes further enquiry was possible. Unles...
Corporate Law : The High Court ruled that wilful default and pending recovery proceedings do not, by themselves, justify Look Out Circulars. Witho...
Read the full text of the order from ITAT Bangalore regarding denial of exemption under Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act for expenses incurred on mementos to Presidents and Secretaries of Milk Producers Association.
Madras High Court ruling on Tvl. Transtonelstory Afcons – Joint Venture vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT). CMRL liable for TDS, not contractors. Full judgment details.
Delhi High Court held that investigation for a period beyond 365 days not resulting in any proceedings relating to any offence under the Act, in terms of Section 8(3) of the PMLA Act, is that such seizure lapses. Thus, property so seized directed to be released.
Delhi High Court held that any non-compliance to the mandate of section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) would vitiate the arrest itself.
Supreme Court held that the recovery certificate itself would give rise to a fresh cause of action entitling a financial creditor to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Delhi High Court held that writ petition filed is not maintainable as per provisions of section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) an appeal is to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal against any Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
Gujarat High Court held that the role of the applicant’s firm in Gujarat State Land Development Corporation (GSLDC Scam) was very limited and was not actually connected with the field work and only to the extent the audit of vouchers and records.
Bombay High Court held that application of Enforcement Directorate u/s. 4 read with Section 12 of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Ordinance, 2018 praying that the Applicant (Mehul Choksi) be declared as a fugitive economic offender is acceptable as requirement of Section 4 duly complied.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the Bank has first charge over the properties being secured creditor in priority over all Other Debts, Revenues, Taxes, Cesses and Other Rates payable to the Central or State Government or Legal Authority.
Madras High Court held that once the purchaser has purchased the property even after knowing about the encumbrances then it is his obligation to discharge the encumbrances. The Bank cannot file a writ petition so as to protect the interest of the third party, who has purchased the property knowing the fact that there are other encumbrances.
