Income Tax : This analysis explains how Parliament designed Sections 11 to 13 to ensure that tax-free income is ultimately used for charitable ...
Income Tax : This analysis explains how charitable and religious trusts qualify for exemption under Sections 11 to 13 of the Income-tax Act. It...
Income Tax : The document highlights situations where exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 can be withdrawn, including benefits provided to inte...
Income Tax : Understand the taxation of trusts in India, covering registered and unregistered trusts. Learn about relevant sections, exemptions...
Income Tax : Shalki Bansal Charitable/religious trusts are the trusts which are formed with an objective of providing relief to poor, education...
Income Tax : Having regard to the gravity of the allegations, the ongoing investigation, the requirement of further probe into digital and fina...
Fema / RBI : The Karnataka High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the respondents satisfied the definition of person resident ...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held that grants disbursed by a statutory corporation formed part of its core business functions and qualified a...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that before the amendment effective from 01.04.2015, exemption under Section 54 could be claimed for investment in...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal admitted the voluntary insolvency application after examining financial statements, bank records, and other documents...
Allahabad High Court held that after one time settlement of loan between borrowers and guarantor with bank, the criminal proceedings against accused [who is neither borrower nor guarantor] having business relation with borrower is liable to be quashed.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of CIRP duly admissible since One-Time Settlement with guarantors didn’t amount to full and final satisfaction of loan vis-à-vis the Corporate Debtor.
Delhi High Court held that since twin conditions required under section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA] has been satisfied, the application for grant of anticipatory bail allowed.
Karnataka High Court held that absence of three persons straightaway rule out the agreement from the scope of intermediary services. Thus, refund granted as independent services provided qualifies as export of services u/s. 2(6) of IGST Act.
NCLAT Delhi held that where Notice under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 makes a demand as per the Guarantee Agreement between the parties, the Notice has to be treated as notice for invocation of Personal Guarantee.
ITAT Delhi held that denial of exemption u/s. 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act not justified as loans are borrowed at higher rate solely for the benefit of the society and under the circumstances which are beyond the control of the assessee-society.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that bail petition is the money laundering matter allowed due to long period of incarceration running for more than 01 year and trial having not been commenced before the trial Court.
NCLT Delhi held that the pendency of proceedings before Debt Recovery Tribunal [DRT] does not preclude or bar the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC].
Supreme Court rejects resolution plan of JSW since Successful Resolution Applicant (JSW) did not implement the Resolution Plan for about two years since its approval by the NCLAT, though there was no legal impediment in implementing the same.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that manufacturer of soft drinks are eligible for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on purchase of refrigerators, coolers and deep freezers in terms of rule 20(2) of the AP VAT Rules, 2005. Accordingly, tax revision case partly allowed.
