Income Tax : This analysis explains how Parliament designed Sections 11 to 13 to ensure that tax-free income is ultimately used for charitable ...
Income Tax : This analysis explains how charitable and religious trusts qualify for exemption under Sections 11 to 13 of the Income-tax Act. It...
Income Tax : The document highlights situations where exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 can be withdrawn, including benefits provided to inte...
Income Tax : Understand the taxation of trusts in India, covering registered and unregistered trusts. Learn about relevant sections, exemptions...
Income Tax : Shalki Bansal Charitable/religious trusts are the trusts which are formed with an objective of providing relief to poor, education...
Income Tax : Having regard to the gravity of the allegations, the ongoing investigation, the requirement of further probe into digital and fina...
Fema / RBI : The Karnataka High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the respondents satisfied the definition of person resident ...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held that grants disbursed by a statutory corporation formed part of its core business functions and qualified a...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that before the amendment effective from 01.04.2015, exemption under Section 54 could be claimed for investment in...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal admitted the voluntary insolvency application after examining financial statements, bank records, and other documents...
The ITAT Delhi affirmed the grant of Section 11 exemption to a charitable society, ruling that if the Assessing Officer fails to make a mandatory reference to the DVO to question a valuation, the registered valuer’s report must be accepted. Since the purchase price was lower than the valuer’s estimate, no benefit accrued to related persons.
Tribunal rules that default occurred before the Section 10A suspension period; admits insolvency petition filed by Omkara ARC against debtor despite Covid-related objections.
Tribunal admits CIRP against Bafna Motors Pvt. Ltd., ruling that post-10A period defaults exceeding the statutory threshold merit insolvency proceedings, with final claim verification to be done by IRP.
NCLT Delhi held that application under section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of CIRP against M/s. Universal Journeys India Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] is admitted since existence of operational debt and default duly established.
NCLT Delhi held that application filed under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by State Bank of India for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution [CIRP] against Giga Pipe Systems Pvt. Ltd. admitted since financial debt and default established.
NCLT Chennai held that discretionary power on NCLT u/s. 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be used to impel financial creditor to consider settlement proposed by Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, CIRP against Aban Offshore Limited admitted.
NCLT Kolkata held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Gupta Power Infrastructure Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted for default of Rs. 2888 Crore.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Process for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Wind World (India) Infrastructure Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted since Financial Creditors have proved existence of debt and default.
NCLAT Delhi held that the core issue of any insolvency proceeding is debt and default. Accordingly, when debt and default is undisputedly established, the Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in accepting the Section 7 application for initiation of CIRP.
Supreme Court held that the Successful Resolution Applicant [SRA] cannot be forced to deal with claims that are not a part of the Request for Resolution Plan [RfRP] issued in terms of Section 25 of the IBC or a part of its Resolution Plan.
