Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : This article examines how natural justice focuses on the fairness of decision-making processes rather than the correctness of outc...
Income Tax : Courts have validated the faceless assessment framework while insisting on strict adherence to fairness. The key takeaway is that ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that issuing an SCN before the pre-SCN reply period expires violates natural justice. The key takeaway is that aut...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that authorities must provide a personal hearing before issuing adverse GST orders under Section 73. Failure to fol...
Income Tax : The High Court held that an assessment order passed without issuing a show cause notice detailing the proposed additions violated ...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that assessment proceedings should include a show cause notice identifying the proposed additions befor...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed the reassessment proceedings after holding that ignoring the assessee's adjournment request violated natural ju...
Income Tax : ITAT remanded the matter after holding that the CIT(A) passed a non-speaking order without giving reasons or properly considering ...
Income Tax : The High Court found that the appellate authority had failed to act on the Tribunal's direction requiring a speaking order for Ass...
Read the Madras High Court’s recent ruling in Voora Property Developers Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT, challenging the Assessment Order dated 08.09.2022 for Assessment Year 2020-21. The court highlighted the failure to consider the petitioner’s response, directing a fresh assessment within four months.
The court found that the impugned order’s conclusion about the petitioner not filing a reply was inconsistent with the documented evidence, rendering the order unsustainable.
Explore the recent ruling by the Madras High Court in N. Kannammal vs. Assessment Unit, highlighting the petitioner’s challenge against an unjust assessment order under Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 07.12.2022, and the court’s directive for a fresh consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness and natural justice.
In TSN Old Iron Scrap Merchants vs. Deputy Commissioner case, Andhra Pradesh High Court rules non-appearance at GST hearing doesn’t violate natural justice.
Petitioner challenged notice on grounds of violating principles of natural justice, citing vagueness and lack of specificity. Court, echoing its earlier decisions upheld the need for detailed and specific show-cause notices.
Calcutta High Court, highlighted importance of affording an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 75(4) of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court emphasized that the absence of compliance with this statutory mandate renders the order unsustainable.
Allahabad High Court’s ruling supported notion that absence of a specified date, time, or venue for personal hearing in notice renders order unsustainable.
R. Soundararajan & Co. challenges GST order in Madras High Court. Notice sent to wrong email, violating natural justice. Detailed analysis of the case and court’s directive.
Court dismisses petitioner’s claim of natural justice violation in tax assessment. Video recording reveals patience during hearing, disproving alleged misconduct.
Explore Delhi High Court judgment on Neelkanth Metals Vs Union of India & Anr., as it sets aside GST Registration cancellation, citing a violation of natural justice.
