Income Tax : Courts have validated the faceless assessment framework while insisting on strict adherence to fairness. The key takeaway is that ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that issuing an SCN before the pre-SCN reply period expires violates natural justice. The key takeaway is that aut...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that authorities must provide a personal hearing before issuing adverse GST orders under Section 73. Failure to fol...
CA, CS, CMA : Explains how electronic notices alone are insufficient for taxpayers lacking digital access, with courts holding such service inef...
Goods and Services Tax : Personal hearing is mandatory in GST adjudication under Section 75(4) before any adverse decision. Courts confirm PH is a non-nego...
Goods and Services Tax : The Orissa High Court set aside GST demand and rectification orders after finding that the taxpayer’s reply and request for pers...
Goods and Services Tax : The Telangana High Court set aside the appellate order rejecting the GST appeal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication aft...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court observed that show cause notices had clearly provided opportunities for personal hearing and submission of documents. It...
Income Tax : The issue concerned taxation of alleged on-money from sale of land. The Tribunal held that once the land was agricultural and outs...
Goods and Services Tax : The case examined whether a GST authority can reject a rectification application without granting a hearing. The High Court set as...
Delhi High Court directs restoration of GST registration for ATT SYS India Pvt Ltd, canceled without a hearing. Analysis of the judgment and its implications.
The court concluded that there was no violation of natural justice, especially as the petitioner chose not to respond to any notices. The assessment order was deemed valid, and the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner retaining the right to explore other legal remedies available.
Kerala High Court nullifies Income Tax order against Anna Aluminium Company, citing violation of natural justice due to disregarding video conferencing hearing request. Full text of judgment included.
Read the Kerala High Court’s judgment annulling Income Tax Act Section 148A(d) order against Dinesh Dinakaran Pillai. Learn about the case and the court’s decision.
The court emphasizes that the petitioner received eight notices under Section 142(1) and two show cause notices under Section 144. Despite ample opportunities, the petitioner did not respond or seek extensions. The court concludes that the petitioner cannot now claim a violation of natural justice, as there was substantial compliance.
This HC directs CIT (A) to consider Appellant’s grounds & pass Order on merits: read our blog post to learn more about this Madras High Court judgment!
Calcutta High Court directs a fresh order on Income Tax Officer’s violation of natural justice in Section 148A(d) case. Details of the judgment here.
Explore the Madras High Court’s judgment in the case of Vikas Sharma vs Additional Commissioner of Customs, addressing penalties on a Customs Officer for abetting gold smuggling. The court examines challenges related to the denial of mandated opportunities under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, emphasizing principles of natural justice. Read the full text for an in-depth analysis and the court’s directive on seeking statutory remedies.
Allahabad HC addresses denial of personal hearing in tax assessment. Ruling emphasizes natural justice principles. Brijesh Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P.
Explore the ITAT Pune order on Seth Bechardas Jain Trust 80G(5) challenge. Detailed analysis of rejection, lack of notice, and violation of natural justice.
