Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLAT ruled that provident fund dues are not corporate debtor assets and must be paid in full during CIRP, prioritizing them o...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that a joint venture arrangement did not prevent insolvency proceedings where separate agreements clearly imposed suppl...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the Corporate Debtor’s email offering payment subject to acceptance of a consequence sheet amounted to acknowled...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
IBC 2016: Resolution Professional, in Law can exercise control over Bank Accounts operated by ‘Corporate Debtor’ only and not otherwise.
Central Government appoints Judicial and Technical Members in National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for a period of four year
Held that conjoint reading of section 33 of IBC with section 16 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 would show that the authority which has power to appoint a person, equally has the power to suspend or dismiss that person.
Jaipur Trade Expocentre Private Limited Vs Metro Jet Airways Training Private Limited (NCLAT Delhi) We have noticed above that Section 3(33) of the Code deals with ‘transaction’. Agreement dated 15.04.2017 is fully covered within the meaning of word ‘transaction’ as defined in Section 3(33). We may also need to look into the meaning of expression […]
Since the petitioners are having effective and statutory remedy before the Appellate Authority, they cannot come to this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The Appellant/Amazon because of the violations committed by it, had intentionally not made known the `real ambit and purpose’ of the `Combination’. Penalty under Section 44 and 45 of the Act, 2002 levied.
Printland Digital (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nirmal Trading Company (NCLAT) NCLAT held that There is a difference between recalling of an order and review on merits of the issue decided by the Adjudicating Authority. No doubt that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to review its order after deciding a substantial issue but it has […]
Kishore K. Lonkar Vs Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) It is not the case of the Appellant that the amounts claimed are due towards any emoluments/salary for the services rendered by him to the ‘Corporate Debtor’, while he was in service. Though ‘service benefits’ like ‘LTC’ accrue, on account of the service rendered during the […]
Held that in non-payment of the TDS amount by the Corporate Debtor there was no occasion for admitting Section 9 Application by the Adjudicating Authority.
Prafulla Purushottamrao Gadge Vs Narayan Mangal (NCLAT Delhi) The submission raised by the Counsel for the Appellant that the Application which has been filed on 25.06.2021 under Section 7 has to fulfill the requirements of threshold as introduced by Notification dated 24.03.2020 has substance. The Adjudicating Authority has not adverted to the said issue and […]
