Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLAT ruled that provident fund dues are not corporate debtor assets and must be paid in full during CIRP, prioritizing them o...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that a joint venture arrangement did not prevent insolvency proceedings where separate agreements clearly imposed suppl...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the Corporate Debtor’s email offering payment subject to acceptance of a consequence sheet amounted to acknowled...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
NCLAT’s decision to end the CIRP against Bhagwandas R. Bhattad, following their complete payment of the principal amount and interest
Learn about the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s (NCLAT) power to recall judgments. Recent rulings clarify that while NCLAT cannot review its judgments, it can use inherent powers under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016, to recall judgments in case of procedural errors. Explore the nuances of this legal power and the distinction between review and recall. Stay informed on the latest legal developments.
NCLAT Delhi held that an appeal under the Companies Act, 2013 would be available to a ‘person’ who is either a ‘Member’ of the Company or a ‘Creditor’ or a ‘Director’. Since, appellant is none of these, appeal before NCLT is not maintainable.
NCLAT approves Kuldeep Singh & Anr’s private sale against Sainsons Pulp and Papers Ltd. liquidator, highlighting full payment with interest after initial delay.
NCLAT Chennai held that condonation in filing of claim under Form-C based on bald explanation without sufficient cause for the delay is not allowable.
NCLAT held that that the Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected the Resolution plan as the same didn’t complied with the provisions of Section 29A(G) read with Section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Detailed review of NCLAT judgment in H S Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Inderjit Singh & Anr., highlighting importance of principle of natural justice in passing orders
NCLAT held that NCLT erred in not allowing to vote in other modes other than in person in meeting of secured and unsecured creditors of Transferee company as permitted as per Companies Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder.
NCLAT Delhi held that the NCLT has no jurisdiction to decide the validity or otherwise of the `Gift Deed’ more so when `fraud’ and `coercion’ is alleged.
NCLAT Delhi held that role of company as well as the appellant in providing inputs for arriving at rigged pricing is somehow or the other proved. Accordingly, imposition of penalty by the Commission cannot be faulted.
