Company Law : The article examines the Hamlin Trust ruling, where the NCLAT held that CFO appointments must satisfy Section 203 eligibility requ...
Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held that a pending NCLAT appeal did not prevent PNB from conducting a Swiss Challenge auction after the OTS proposal wa...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Income Tax : NCLAT held that a single application covering multiple years and company officers is maintainable in the absence of any statutory ...
Corporate Law : Tribunal held that proviso to Regulation 7A allows insolvency professionals to continue assignments already underway even after th...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
Lincon Polymers Private Limited had manufacturing facilities, one at Khatraj and one at Borisana. The Khatraj manufacturing facility was catering to domestic market whereas the Borisana facility was catering to export market.
NCLAT Delhi held that since the value of corporate debtor was covered by exemption issued by MCA by notification dated 07.03.2024 hence provision of section 5 of Competition Act, 2002 is not applicable, accordingly, there was no requirement of any approval from Competition Commission of India [CCI] for approval of resolution plan.
NCLAT Delhi held that since existence of financial debt and default thereon is established, the adjudicating authority has rightly admitted section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that application for liquidation of Corporate Debtor should be proceeded as there was sufficient ground to hold that resolution plan is not implemented. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that debt and default on the part of Corporate Debtor proved and hence application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code duly admissible. Thus, appeal dismissed and order of adjudicating authority upheld.
NCLAT Delhi held that proposed sale in the form of private sale to related party being not in conformity with Regulation 33 of IBBI (Liquidation Regulations), 2016 hence order of Adjudication Authority allowing such private sale is liable to be set aside.
NCLAT Delhi held that restoration application rightly dismissed as personal guarantor was trying to abuse the process of law by misusing the moratorium available to him under section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The Appellants submitted that there were multiple violations of Section 30(2) of the Code, which prohibits the CoC from approving a plan that violates many laws and many provisions of the Code and Regulations.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rightly dismissed as debt fell within restricted period under section 10A. accordingly, order of Adjudicating Authority upheld.
CIRP against the Corporate Debtor-Rajesh Cityspaces Private Limited commenced on 15.01.2024. Mr. Ajit Gyanchand Jain- Respondent No.1 was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
