ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on dividend from co-operative banks, following coordinate bench decisions for ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune remanded the Section 80P deduction issue for fresh assessment after noting relevant precedents and directing reconsidera...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest from co-operative bank deposits, following binding judicial pre...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT held Section 50C provisos applicable to oral agreements backed by bank payments and deleted related additions, remand...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT deleted the Section 271D penalty, holding temporary cash received to demonstrate visa funds was not a loan attracting...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Bangalore held that the Income-tax Act does not prohibit a charitable trust from filing a second application for registration under Section 12AB after an earlier rejection.
ITAT ruled that the reassessment order passed under Section 147 was unsustainable as it exceeded the limitation period prescribed by the Income-tax Act. The decision highlights that statutory timelines cannot be ignored without supporting evidence from the Revenue.
ITAT Bangalore deleted the penalty under Section 270A after holding that the assessee’s incorrect claim arose from a bona fide misunderstanding of a newly introduced provision under Section 71(3A).
ITAT Bangalore held that reassessment cannot survive where the Assessing Officer makes no addition on the very issue for which the assessment was reopened. The Tribunal deleted the Section 54 disallowance, holding that additions on unrelated issues are unsustainable once the original reopening ground fails.
ITAT Bangalore held that a ₹5 lakh investment could not be treated as unexplained under Section 69 where documentary evidence showed it was made through a cheque issued by the tenant under a lease arrangement.
ITAT Bangalore held that a genuine claim of application of income supported by documentary evidence cannot be denied merely because of a reporting mismatch in different schedules of the income tax return.
ITAT Bangalore held that where the assessee disputed the stamp duty valuation and furnished a registered valuer’s report, the Assessing Officer ought to have referred the matter to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO).
ITAT Bangalore held that once a search under Section 132 was conducted, the assessment for the relevant year had to proceed under Section 147/148 in accordance with the post-2021 statutory scheme.
The ITAT Bangalore held that a mismatch between the income tax return and Form 3CD cannot by itself justify disallowance of a genuine bonus payment. It allowed the deduction after finding that the payment was supported by books of account and bank records.
ITAT Visakhapatnam remanded the assessment after holding that documentary evidence relating to cash deposits, members’ records and audit reports required proper verification. The Tribunal directed a fresh assessment without expressing any opinion on the merits.
