ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Bangalore deletes an unexplained cash addition, ruling that cash deposits during demonetization are not taxable if they are supported by prior bank withdrawals.
ITAT Bangalore quashes a reassessment order for Star Ceramics, ruling that an improper sanction from the wrong authority invalidates the entire proceeding.
ITAT Bangalore rules that an appeal cannot be dismissed for non-prosecution. The CIT(A) is bound to adjudicate on the merits, especially in complex JDA cases.
ITAT Bangalore deletes additions in the KC Raju Hospital case, confirming that no additions can be made to unabated assessment years without specific incriminating material.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act treating unsecured loan as unexplained credit not justified since assessee has proved identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the credit. Accordingly, appeal is allowed.
ITAT Delhi rules Section 68 inapplicable as purchases were genuine and creditors identified. ₹3.36 Cr addition deleted in Shiv Hari Singla vs ITO case.
ITAT Lucknow held that deduction under section 80IB and section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act is simultaneously allowable from the net profit. Accordingly, addition is directed to be deleted and appeal is allowed.
ITAT Cochin has quashed a tax demand, ruling that cooperative banks can claim a deduction under Section 80P for interest earned from District Co-operative Banks and Treasury, citing a Kerala High Court precedent.
ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling in the CSJ Infrastructure tax case addresses the application of Section 43CA and the tax treatment of interest on land conversion fees.
SEO Description: The ITAT Bangalore has remanded a case back to the tax office to verify whether employee PF/ESI contributions were paid on time, noting a discrepancy between the audit report and the taxpayer’s claim.
