This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No 69A Addition When Deposits Linked to Earlier Withdrawals – Idle Cash Argument Not Enough
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hamsakala Suresh Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Hamsakala Suresh Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
No 69A Addition When Deposits Linked to Earlier Withdrawals – Idle Cash Argument Not Enough- Burden Shifts to Revenue – Withdrawals Sufficient to Justify Deposits, Addition Deleted
Bangalore Tribunal in the case of has held that when cash deposits during the demonetisation period are supported by earlier withdrawals, such deposits cannot be taxed as unexplained u/s 69A.
Assessee, an individual, had filed return of income declaring ₹1,23,680 under the head “Income from Other Sources.” During assessment, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹48,50,...
Author Info
