ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The ITAT has remanded the case of Shamrock Apparels to the CIT(A), granting a final opportunity to contest a ₹31.22 lakh adjustment to its Long-Term Capital Gains.
A co-operative society tax deduction was denied due to a late return. The ITAT has sent the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh look citing an error in the previous ruling.
Delhi ITAT has clarified that due date for PF/ESI contributions starts from date of salary disbursement, not accrual. Case has been remanded for re-verification.
The Delhi ITAT has dismissed an appeal from Edynamics Solutions, upholding the taxation of large-scale banking transactions, and rejecting the claim of a 2% commission.
The ITAT has deleted transfer pricing adjustments for Avaada group companies, ruling that Section 115BAB doesn’t apply to pre-operative businesses with no taxable income.
The Delhi ITAT has ruled that an income enhancement by a CIT(A) is illegal if done without a mandatory notice under Section 251. The Tribunal set aside the order and restored the original assessment.
ITAT Bangalore sets aside tax demand of ₹7.29 crore on a rural co-op society, citing its inability to explain a ₹4.63 crore cash deposit due to a negligent tax practitioner.
The ITAT has quashed an income tax assessment against Dinesh Kumar Jain, ruling that a mere code name, “Thekedar,” in seized data was not enough to prove unaccounted income without corroborative evidence.
The ITAT quashed a final assessment order against a company that no longer existed due to amalgamation, ruling the order void despite departmental knowledge of the merger.
The ITAT quashed an assessment against Karan Motors, ruling it was void because the Income Tax Department failed to prove the ACIT’s jurisdiction to act as the Assessing Officer.
