Case Law Details
Case Name : Paltex Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Paltex Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act treating unsecured loan as unexplained credit not justified since assessee has proved identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the credit. Accordingly, appeal is allowed.
Facts- The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee mainly contesting that CIT(A) has erred in confirming addition under section 68 of ₹ 2.50 lakhs by treating unsecured loan from Anjana Prajapati as unexplained credit. The lower authority has treated unsecured loan as unexplained credit only for the reasons that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

