CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act does not prescribe a single definition of "relative" for all purposes. Different provisions such as Sections 13...
Income Tax : Understand when 1% TDS applies on purchase of immovable property under Section 194-IA. Learn the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, compliance...
Income Tax : This guide explains when NRIs should use Form 128 and when payers should use Form 129 to reduce or eliminate excess TDS. It also c...
Income Tax : The article argues that Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 does not independently mandate books of account or tax audit for...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : This webinar breaks down the major structural and conceptual changes introduced in the new Income Tax Act, 2025. It helps professi...
Income Tax : The government informed Parliament that taxpayer-specific details of income tax searches cannot be disclosed due to confidentialit...
Income Tax : The Government clarified that the new income tax search provision does not expand powers or permit AI-based digital surveillance, ...
Income Tax : The representation highlights large-scale pendency and administrative bottlenecks under Sections 12AB and 80G, urging immediate re...
Income Tax : Madras HC set aside cognizance under the Income-tax Act, holding Section 223(1) BNSS mandates hearing the accused before cognizanc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed a Section 148 notice, holding that a seized inquiry register without a live nexus to the assessee cannot justif...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed Section 148 reassessment as it was issued beyond Section 149 limitation, holding Section 152(3) applies to sear...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved a scientific research institution under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax years 2026-27 to 2030-31. The notificat...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved the University of Hyderabad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The approval i...
Income Tax : The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) approved the company under Section 35(1)(iia) for scientific research ...
Income Tax : The government enforced a tax collection assistance agreement with Japan effective from 8 July 2025. The notification enables cros...
Income Tax : CBDT updated DIN rules to align with new provisions introduced under the Finance Act, 2026. The circular mandates DIN for most tax...
ITAT Kolkata held that employees should not bear tax liability again where TDS was deducted but not deposited by the employer.
Bombay High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, holding it could not challenge the ITAT’s addition after not appealing the CIT(A)’s order.
The Madras High Court ruled that employers cannot grant Section 89 relief or refund TDS unless employees submit Form 10E under Section 192(2A). Employees must claim eligible refunds by filing their income-tax returns.
The Income Tax Bill, 2025 renumbers Section 54F as Section 86 while retaining the existing conditions, computation, and exemption framework.
The Madras High Court dismissed challenges to the transfer of income-tax prosecution cases to the MP/MLA Special Court. It held that the transfer was consistent with the framework arising from the Supreme Court’s directions.
Calcutta High Court quashed the assessment, demand and penalty proceedings after holding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of hearing.
The Chhattisgarh High Court declined to direct the Income Tax Department to investigate alleged tax evasion after noting that the Tax Evasion Petition had already been rejected as barred by limitation. It held that no writ of mandamus could be issued on the facts of the case.
Delhi High Court held the ITAT failed to properly examine the ‘make available’ test for secondment payments, set aside its order, and ruled for the Revenue.
GST Rule 86B cannot independently justify cash recovery where tax is fully paid through valid ITC. Court held the rule is procedural, not charging.
Gujarat HC quashed the reassessment proceedings after holding that ignoring the assessee’s adjournment request violated natural justice.
