This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance for Short TDS Deduction When Payee Has Paid Tax: Bombay HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Morgan Stanley India Capital Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
PCIT Vs Morgan Stanley India Capital Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court Rejects Section 14A Disallowance Because Investments Were Made From Own Funds; Bombay HC Says Mixed Funds Cannot Automatically Trigger Rule 8D Interest Disallowance; Section 14A Addition Deleted Because Loans Were Taken After Investments Were Made: Bombay HC; Bombay High Court Upholds ITAT Order Deleting Rule 8D and Section 40(a)(ia) Additions.
The Bombay High Court heard an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 11.10.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...
Author Info
