Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Morgan Stanley India Capital Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Morgan Stanley India Capital Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court Rejects Section 14A Disallowance Because Investments Were Made From Own Funds;  Bombay HC Says Mixed Funds Cannot Automatically Trigger Rule 8D Interest Disallowance;  Section 14A Addition Deleted Because Loans Were Taken After Investments Were Made: Bombay HC;  Bombay High Court Upholds ITAT Order Deleting Rule 8D and Section 40(a)(ia) Additions. The Bombay High Court heard an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 11.10.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessmen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031