Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : Madras HC held Section 153C action must be supported by incriminating material relatable to the relevant assessment year, distingu...
Income Tax : Delhi HC upheld Section 263 revision, holding an unreasoned assessment on subsidy was erroneous, and remanded the issue for fresh ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC set aside a GST assessment passed against a deceased person, holding it non est in law, and permitted legal heirs to res...
Income Tax : Delhi HC held interest on borrowings for strategic shareholding may qualify under Section 36(1)(iii). Matter remanded to AO to ver...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that date of making payment under Sabka Vishwas [Legacy Dispute Resolution] Scheme [SVLDR Scheme] extended due to COVID pandemic since denying benefit of SVLDR Scheme would be contrary to the object of the scheme.
Jharkhand High Court held that review can only be sought if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of the record. A review petition has a limited purpose and cannot be allowed to be ‘an appeal in disguise’. Accordingly, review petition dismissed.
The Bombay High Court set aside a GST recovery notice issued to a bank, ruling that the taxpayer must receive prior notice and an opportunity to dispute liability under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act.
The Madras High Court directed a fresh GST assessment, citing a violation of natural justice when a taxpayer’s emailed reply was ignored and no personal hearing was granted.
Madras High Court held that the question of jurisdiction of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to conduct proceedings under section 148A of the Income Tax Act is referred to Larger Bench. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
Madras High Court rules phone tapping for crime detection violates privacy. Interception justified only in public emergency/safety; material collected illegally cannot be used.
According to assessee, these claims were arbitrarily “zeroed out” in June 2018 without any speaking order or prior intimation, and without issuing a deficiency memo highlighting the alleged deficiencies in the claims.
The applicant sent the statutory demand notice to the accused on 23.05.2009 which was duly served but no payment was made. The applicant filed the criminal complaint before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate u/s. 138 of the NI Act, 1881.
Kulveer Vs State of Himachal Pradesh (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Himachal Pradesh High Court held that applicant not ipso facto entitled for relief of bail merely on the ground that case is triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate. Accordingly, bail application in money laundering matter dismissed. Facts- Applicant-Kulveer has filed the present application, under […]
Calcutta High Court held that period of offence prior to June 1, 2009 attracts Schedule to Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA] being amended with effect from June 1, 2009 as proceeds of crime continue in possession till Amendment.
