Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court held that a three-month gap between the alleged harassment and the student’s suicide broke the necessar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court held that the Central Board of Trustees under the EPF Act can challenge Tribunal orders under Article 226 since ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that investment-linked tax incentives under the 2012 industrial policy could continue unless specifically with...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside a GST demand order after finding that the hearing notice was received by the taxpayer only after the hear...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a single GST assessment order covering multiple financial years violated Sections 73 and 74 of...
Goods and Services Tax : Uttarakhand High Court directed refund of GST deducted on sale of rejected wheat and paddy seeds after noting that the goods were ...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Delhi HC rules FIRCs need not match exports transaction-wise for ITC claims. Total foreign remittance suffices; case remitted for fresh adjudication.
Court emphasized that authorities must follow statutory procedure and provide a hearing before passing GST orders affecting taxpayers’ rights, remitting the case for fresh consideration.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST refund appeal order after finding a system error generated a personal hearing notice post-decision, violating natural justice.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging a Rs. 1.51 crore GST demand, ruling that the petitioner must utilize the statutory appeal process under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Delhi HC quashes ₹2.25 crore GST demand, citing a natural justice violation after the Adjudicating Authority denied an adjournment request and passed an ex-parte order.
Court observed that mere compliance by portal upload cannot replace genuine service of notice and directed reassessment after giving the taxpayer a fair hearing.
The Bombay High Court set aside an order denying Vesava Koli Samaj Shikshan Sanstha’s request to condone a 181-day delay in filing Form 10B for AY 2019-20, citing genuine cause.
Karnataka High Court holds Amazon Development Centre’s support services to foreign affiliates qualify as export of services under IGST Act, directing refund of ₹3.25 crore ITC with interest.
Delhi High Court orders Income Tax Department to refund Rs. 5.10 crore with interest to Agilent Technologies for AY 2014-15, citing lack of justification for withholding.
The J&K&L High Court rules a woman cannot claim maintenance from a partner convicted of rape on the promise of marriage, stating a spousal relationship cannot coexist with a rape charge.
