Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court quashed a POCSO FIR after noting that the relationship was consensual and the parties were married with a chi...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Goods and Services Tax : Works contracts for government buildings and educational institutions remain a highly litigated area therefore, merely relying upo...
Goods and Services Tax : The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside a GST demand order after holding that service through affixation without exhausting ot...
Goods and Services Tax : The Bombay High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order after finding that the show cause notice contained no reasons....
Income Tax : Chhattisgarh High Court held that alleged low production yield and power consumption variations could not justify addition without...
Goods and Services Tax : The Jammu & Kashmir High Court directed restoration of GST registration even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as bar...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
The Delhi High Court quashed an ex parte GST demand order and remanded the case after finding that no effective opportunity of reply or personal hearing was granted.
The High Court held that the tax department cannot deny set-off of short-term capital loss when the same claim was accepted in factually identical connected cases. Consistency in tax treatment was upheld.
The court examined a challenge to a DIR-12 filing that removed multiple directors without consent and held that the form was prima facie defective, directing fresh consideration after hearing all parties.
The court held that delay in seeking a TDS refund could be condoned where tax was deducted due to an error, and directed authorities to examine the refund claim on merits.
The Bombay High Court held that vague allegations of natural justice violations cannot justify skipping the appellate remedy under the Customs Act.
The issue was whether expiry of the revocation timeline bars restoration of GST registration. The Court ruled that authorities can restore registration when pending returns and full tax liabilities are cleared as per Rule 22.
The High Court found prima facie merit in the challenge to a state reimbursement clause restricting ITC. Show cause notices seeking reversal of ITC were stayed pending further hearing.
The court clarified that exemption notifications must be applied as issued and cannot be altered by importing supposed intent. Any attempt to add or curtail benefits retrospectively was held to be beyond legislative delegation.
The High Court held that a show cause notice lacking factual details cannot sustain cancellation of GST registration. The cancellation order was set aside and fresh opportunity was granted to the taxpayer.
The case concerned a challenge to VAT enforcement on liquor retail shops. The Court ruled that statutory tax requirements cannot be stayed when the law itself is not under challenge.
